HLG 159/1318 - Revision history

Chris5156: Add link to MT 120/250

2019-08-31T00:29:11Z

Add link to MT 120/250

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:29, 31 August 2019
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Among their grievences are:		Among their grievences are:
	* That only a pair of arrowheads show the route of Ringway 3 across their patch of London, but various documents and the position of the arrows can, together, be used to easy deduce the lines under consideration. This, they argue, amounts to planning blight; what's more the uncertainty is leading people to make their own conclusions. They refer to an edition of the ''Sutton and Cheam Advertiser'' that did just that: put the pieces together and 'announced' the result as the GLC's motorway route, scaring residents across the borough.		* That only a pair of arrowheads show the route of Ringway 3 across their patch of London, but various documents and the position of the arrows can, together, be used to easy deduce the lines under consideration. This, they argue, amounts to planning blight; what's more the uncertainty is leading people to make their own conclusions. They refer to an edition of the ''Sutton and Cheam Advertiser'' that did just that: put the pieces together and 'announced' the result as the GLC's motorway route, scaring residents across the borough. The actual newspaper report, and some more detail about this incident, is misfiled at [[MT 120/250]].
	* Ringway 3 in the south west is programmed too far into the future to call it a serious plan now, and the likelihood of plans changing in the future makes safeguarding it at this early stage a nonsense.		* Ringway 3 in the south west is programmed too far into the future to call it a serious plan now, and the likelihood of plans changing in the future makes safeguarding it at this early stage a nonsense.
	* There are discrepancies in the GLC's argument that must be resolved. Principal among them is the GLC's assertion that Ringway 3 in the south west is urgently needed and that the South Orbital should come later, when in reality no official line had even been chosen for that part of R3 while the Ministry of Transport was already building the South Orbital motorway.		* There are discrepancies in the GLC's argument that must be resolved. Principal among them is the GLC's assertion that Ringway 3 in the south west is urgently needed and that the South Orbital should come later, when in reality no official line had even been chosen for that part of R3 while the Ministry of Transport was already building the South Orbital motorway.

Chris5156 at 15:59, 31 December 2012

2012-12-31T15:59:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:59, 31 December 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:
	\| title = London Borough of Sutton: Ringway 3 and Route 27		\| title = London Borough of Sutton: Ringway 3 and Route 27
	\| daterange = 1971		\| daterange = 1971
	\| nacatref =		\| nacatref = 8451075
	\| series = HLG		\| series = HLG
	\| subseries = 159		\| subseries = 159

Chris5156: Add category R3

2011-03-10T19:09:53Z

Add category R3

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:09, 10 March 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Category:Subseries HLG 159]][[Category:Ringways]]		[[Category:Subseries HLG 159]][[Category:Ringways]][[Category:Ringway 3]]
	{{Header		{{Header
	\| title = London Borough of Sutton: Ringway 3 and Route 27		\| title = London Borough of Sutton: Ringway 3 and Route 27

Chris5156: New page: Category:Subseries HLG 159Category:Ringways {{Header | title = London Borough of Sutton: Ringway 3 and Route 27 | daterange = 1971 | nacatref = | series = HLG | subseries ...

2011-02-02T22:39:40Z

New page: Category:Subseries HLG 159 Category:Ringways {{Header | title = London Borough of Sutton: Ringway 3 and Route 27 | daterange = 1971 | nacatref = | series = HLG | subseries ...

New page

[[Category:Subseries HLG 159]][[Category:Ringways]]
{{Header
| title = London Borough of Sutton: Ringway 3 and Route 27
| daterange = 1971
| nacatref =
| series = HLG
| subseries = 159
}}

==Context==
The London Borough of Sutton was one of many that was unhappy with the GLC's motorway plans. Here it sets out a summary of its objections for the benefit of the GLDP inquiry panel.

Among their grievences are:
* That only a pair of arrowheads show the route of Ringway 3 across their patch of London, but various documents and the position of the arrows can, together, be used to easy deduce the lines under consideration. This, they argue, amounts to planning blight; what's more the uncertainty is leading people to make their own conclusions. They refer to an edition of the ''Sutton and Cheam Advertiser'' that did just that: put the pieces together and 'announced' the result as the GLC's motorway route, scaring residents across the borough.
* Ringway 3 in the south west is programmed too far into the future to call it a serious plan now, and the likelihood of plans changing in the future makes safeguarding it at this early stage a nonsense.
* There are discrepancies in the GLC's argument that must be resolved. Principal among them is the GLC's assertion that Ringway 3 in the south west is urgently needed and that the South Orbital should come later, when in reality no official line had even been chosen for that part of R3 while the Ministry of Transport was already building the South Orbital motorway.

==People with camera copies==
[[User:Chris5156|Chris Marshall]] has a complete copy.