MT 95/86 - Revision history

Chris5156 at 17:23, 4 March 2011

2011-03-04T17:23:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:23, 4 March 2011
Line 18:		Line 18:

	==Links to related files==		==Links to related files==
	:'''[[MT 110/3]] London County Council: 'A' ring road (1947-1954)		:'''[[MT 110/3]]''' London County Council: 'A' ring road (1947-1954)

	==People with camera copies==		==People with camera copies==
	[[User:Chris5156\|Chris Marshall]] has a partial copy, including the whole of the report.		[[User:Chris5156\|Chris Marshall]] has a partial copy, including the whole of the report.
	__NOTOC__		__NOTOC__

Chris5156 at 17:23, 4 March 2011

2011-03-04T17:23:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:23, 4 March 2011
Line 16:		Line 16:
	* Report recommending that Abercrombie's plans be taken forward, with a less destructive A-Ring and an arterial standard B-ring.		* Report recommending that Abercrombie's plans be taken forward, with a less destructive A-Ring and an arterial standard B-ring.
	* Diagrams of a building on Tavistock Square that was to contain a void in the basement for the A-Ring to pass beneath it.		* Diagrams of a building on Tavistock Square that was to contain a void in the basement for the A-Ring to pass beneath it.

			==Links to related files==
			:'''[[MT 110/3]] London County Council: 'A' ring road (1947-1954)

	==People with camera copies==		==People with camera copies==
	[[User:Chris5156\|Chris Marshall]] has a partial copy, including the whole of the report.		[[User:Chris5156\|Chris Marshall]] has a partial copy, including the whole of the report.
	__NOTOC__		__NOTOC__

Chris5156: Add new header

2009-12-04T20:16:29Z

Add new header

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:16, 4 December 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Category:Subseries MT 95]][[Category:Ringways]]		[[Category:Subseries MT 95]][[Category:Ringways]]
	{\|		{{Header
	~~\|'''Location'''~~		\| title = Ring roads 'A' and 'B'
	~~\|[[National Archives]]~~		\| daterange = 1945-1955
	\|-		\| nacatref = 2056488
	~~\|'''Title'''~~		\| series = MT
	\|Ring roads 'A' and 'B'		\| subseries = 95
	\|-		}}
	~~\|'''Date range'''~~
	\|1945-1955
	\|-
	\|~~'''Catalogue'''~~
	\|~~[http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/displaycataloguedetails.asp?CATLN=6&CATID~~=~~2056488 See entry]~~
	\|}

	==Context==		==Context==

Chris5156 at 20:34, 20 January 2009

2009-01-20T20:34:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:34, 20 January 2009
Line 17:		Line 17:
	Much of this file deals with the Ministry's dithering over how it should try to implement the recommendations of the Greater London and County of London Plans. In particular it contains a slim report on whether Abercrombie's plan or the Ministry's plan should be carried out – the difference being which of the A and B rings should be arterial and which sub-arterial.		Much of this file deals with the Ministry's dithering over how it should try to implement the recommendations of the Greater London and County of London Plans. In particular it contains a slim report on whether Abercrombie's plan or the Ministry's plan should be carried out – the difference being which of the A and B rings should be arterial and which sub-arterial.

	The report goes into great detail in describing all four proposals (ie. Arterial and non-arterial A and B rings), and also includes a schedule of all historic buildings and public amenities that would be destroyed or compromised for the road schemes. The description is annoyingly hazy around Wandsworth, but the sketchy outline map makes it look like Trinity Road Underpass and the gyratory on the approach to Wandsworth Bridge were supposed to be part of the arterial B-ring.		The report goes into great detail in describing all four proposals (ie. Arterial and non-arterial A and B rings), and also includes a schedule of all historic buildings and public amenities that would be destroyed or compromised for the road schemes.

	==Contents of note==		==Contents of note==

Chris5156: New page: Category:Subseries MT 95Category:Ringways {| |'''Location''' |National Archives |- |'''Title''' |Ring roads 'A' and 'B' |- |'''Date range''' |1945-1955 |- |'''Catalogue''' |[ht...

2009-01-20T20:30:16Z

New page: Category:Subseries MT 95 Category:Ringways {| |'''Location''' |National Archives |- |'''Title''' |Ring roads 'A' and 'B' |- |'''Date range''' |1945-1955 |- |'''Catalogue''' |[ht...

New page

[[Category:Subseries MT 95]][[Category:Ringways]]
{|
|'''Location'''
|[[National Archives]]
|-
|'''Title'''
|Ring roads 'A' and 'B'
|-
|'''Date range'''
|1945-1955
|-
|'''Catalogue'''
|[http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/displaycataloguedetails.asp?CATLN=6&CATID=2056488 See entry]
|}

==Context==
Much of this file deals with the Ministry's dithering over how it should try to implement the recommendations of the Greater London and County of London Plans. In particular it contains a slim report on whether Abercrombie's plan or the Ministry's plan should be carried out – the difference being which of the A and B rings should be arterial and which sub-arterial.

The report goes into great detail in describing all four proposals (ie. Arterial and non-arterial A and B rings), and also includes a schedule of all historic buildings and public amenities that would be destroyed or compromised for the road schemes. The description is annoyingly hazy around Wandsworth, but the sketchy outline map makes it look like Trinity Road Underpass and the gyratory on the approach to Wandsworth Bridge were supposed to be part of the arterial B-ring.

==Contents of note==
* Report recommending that Abercrombie's plans be taken forward, with a less destructive A-Ring and an arterial standard B-ring.
* Diagrams of a building on Tavistock Square that was to contain a void in the basement for the A-Ring to pass beneath it.

==People with camera copies==
[[User:Chris5156|Chris Marshall]] has a partial copy, including the whole of the report.
__NOTOC__