<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://archive.roads.org.uk/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=National_Archives_2012-03-22</id>
	<title>National Archives 2012-03-22 - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://archive.roads.org.uk/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=National_Archives_2012-03-22"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://archive.roads.org.uk/index.php?title=National_Archives_2012-03-22&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-28T19:28:46Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://archive.roads.org.uk/index.php?title=National_Archives_2012-03-22&amp;diff=1778&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>J N Winkler: New page: Arrived around 1.30 PM, massively late--the District line was not running on the Richmond branch.  I walked past the sign explaining the service suspension before I read it, and since it w...</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://archive.roads.org.uk/index.php?title=National_Archives_2012-03-22&amp;diff=1778&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2012-03-27T12:23:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;New page: Arrived around 1.30 PM, massively late--the District line was not running on the Richmond branch.  I walked past the sign explaining the service suspension before I read it, and since it w...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Arrived around 1.30 PM, massively late--the District line was not running on the Richmond branch.  I walked past the sign explaining the service suspension before I read it, and since it was right at the ticket barrier I could not double back and read it without wasting a fare, but I gathered it had to do with a signal failure.  The online service advisory page suggests the District line is back to normal, but I don&amp;#039;t altogether trust it, and will try to look for a page refresh date and time stamp.  This day will be a mixture of document photography and examining documents.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MT 120/96&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This file has Engineering Appreciations for the Trunk Road Master Plan.  Photographed one (TR 8) as a sample:  this starts as the A4 in London and runs out to the South West.  One is also available for TR 12 (London-Carlisle-Glasgow), but I am not photographing this.  TR 33 (London-Tilbury) also available; not photographed.  A document, &amp;quot;Trunk Road Master Plan:  Engineering Appreciation:  Instructions for Preparation&amp;quot; is not being photographed because it is believed to have been photographed with MT 120/95; check that this is the case.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MT 39/299&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This file deals with the Lloyd George proposals--it is actually several subfiles within one folder cover.  I have photographed all except the last, which deals with roads and bridges.  I shall finish this file on my next visit to the National Archives.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
MT 110/3&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This file deals with the &amp;quot;A&amp;quot; Ring, though the early part (in a separate folder) deals with general suggestions for reducing or relieving London congestion, including fairly radical ideas such as house-swapping (proposed by Aneurin Bevan, invariably spelled &amp;quot;swopping&amp;quot;) or applying planning control to home-to-work commutes.  In the main part of the file, of particular interest is a note describing a meeting (date not given, but probably 20 or 21 April 1950) in which Barnes (Minister of Transport) and Dalton (Minister of Town &amp;amp; Country Planning) agreed to kill the &amp;quot;A&amp;quot; Ring scheme, over the objections of E.B. Hugh-Jones and others.  The file as a whole is probably not photographable but still of interest.  Another memorandum gives the history of the scheme, and there is a memorandum from Barnes and Dalton asking the Lord President&amp;#039;s Committee for a decision on it (it looks like said decision was kicked back to them).  Actually, the file as a whole is worth photographing and should not take too long because the majority of it consists of drafts of the joint memorandum (which can be omitted) and also a copy of the &amp;quot;A&amp;quot; Ring technical report, which I already have through the Rees Jeffreys papers.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>J N Winkler</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>