User talk:Ritchie333 - Revision history

Ritchie333: /* Grammar */

2011-09-29T11:37:33Z

Grammar

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:37, 29 September 2011
Line 48:		Line 48:

	(While I'm ranting at you, nice work on tidying up the "going back to see" template and categories. Very nice!) --[[User:Chris5156\|chris5156]] 12:13, 28 September 2011 (UTC)		(While I'm ranting at you, nice work on tidying up the "going back to see" template and categories. Very nice!) --[[User:Chris5156\|chris5156]] 12:13, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

			:Just as well we don't have forums here - you'd call them "fora" or some such other flowery nonsense :-P --[[User:Ritchie333\|Ritchie333]] 11:37, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

Chris5156: /* Grammar */

2011-09-28T12:14:22Z

Grammar

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:14, 28 September 2011
Line 45:		Line 45:
	Chris's (grammatically incorrect) shopping list? How very dare you.		Chris's (grammatically incorrect) shopping list? How very dare you.

	OK - so technically, I ought to describe things that are mine as Chris', but seriously, how does that ever make sense? I wilfully ignore that rule because what I ~~[i]~~say~~[/i]~~ is "Chris's", and I give way to no man in my pursuit of that little slice of rebellion.		OK - so technically, I ought to describe things that are mine as Chris', but seriously, how does that ever make sense? I wilfully ignore that rule because what I ''say'' is "Chris's", and I give way to no man in my pursuit of that little slice of rebellion.

	(While I'm ranting at you, nice work on tidying up the "going back to see" template and categories. Very nice!) --[[User:Chris5156\|chris5156]] 12:13, 28 September 2011 (UTC)		(While I'm ranting at you, nice work on tidying up the "going back to see" template and categories. Very nice!) --[[User:Chris5156\|chris5156]] 12:13, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Chris5156: /* Grammar */ new section

2011-09-28T12:13:47Z

Grammar: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:13, 28 September 2011
Line 40:		Line 40:

	In future I want to turn up and put my notes straight into the wiki, which was my original intention when I set this place up. I'd been scuppered until now by their wifi restrictions.--[[User:Chris5156\|chris5156]] 17:30, 30 March 2011 (UTC)		In future I want to turn up and put my notes straight into the wiki, which was my original intention when I set this place up. I'd been scuppered until now by their wifi restrictions.--[[User:Chris5156\|chris5156]] 17:30, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

			== Grammar ==

			Chris's (grammatically incorrect) shopping list? How very dare you.

			OK - so technically, I ought to describe things that are mine as Chris', but seriously, how does that ever make sense? I wilfully ignore that rule because what I [i]say[/i] is "Chris's", and I give way to no man in my pursuit of that little slice of rebellion.

			(While I'm ranting at you, nice work on tidying up the "going back to see" template and categories. Very nice!) --[[User:Chris5156\|chris5156]] 12:13, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Chris5156: /* National Archives wifi */ new section

2011-03-30T17:30:12Z

National Archives wifi: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:30, 30 March 2011
Line 32:		Line 32:
	::I don't see why not - I think I've gone through the whole file now and extracted most of the interesting bits of it. I think there's one or two odds and sods I wanted to camera copy for reference, but nothing else. I'd be tempted to "de-stub" [[MT 39/246]] for the same reason. --[[User:Ritchie333\|Ritchie333]] 10:12, 18 February 2010 (UTC)		::I don't see why not - I think I've gone through the whole file now and extracted most of the interesting bits of it. I think there's one or two odds and sods I wanted to camera copy for reference, but nothing else. I'd be tempted to "de-stub" [[MT 39/246]] for the same reason. --[[User:Ritchie333\|Ritchie333]] 10:12, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
	:::"De-stub"? "Contra-stub"? "Disstubulate"? I think we need a meeting to discuss proper terminology ;) --[[User:Chris5156\|chris5156]] 11:28, 18 February 2010 (UTC)		:::"De-stub"? "Contra-stub"? "Disstubulate"? I think we need a meeting to discuss proper terminology ;) --[[User:Chris5156\|chris5156]] 11:28, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

			== National Archives wifi ==

			Hello... I think TNA has had wifi for a long time now. I've been using it for a couple of years I think.

			Re. archivewiki being available on their wifi - it's accessible from the document ordering terminals too. It was blocked previously, but I put in a request for it to be vetted and approved. My flying visit today was the first time I've been in there that archivewiki was accessible there! Hooray!

			In future I want to turn up and put my notes straight into the wiki, which was my original intention when I set this place up. I'd been scuppered until now by their wifi restrictions.--[[User:Chris5156\|chris5156]] 17:30, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Chris5156: /* MT 39/241 */

2010-02-18T11:28:32Z

MT 39/241

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:28, 18 February 2010
Line 31:		Line 31:
	I think we can remove the 'stub' template from this page now, unless you have some pretty epic plans for it? :) --[[User:Chris5156\|chris5156]] 22:05, 17 February 2010 (UTC)		I think we can remove the 'stub' template from this page now, unless you have some pretty epic plans for it? :) --[[User:Chris5156\|chris5156]] 22:05, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
	::I don't see why not - I think I've gone through the whole file now and extracted most of the interesting bits of it. I think there's one or two odds and sods I wanted to camera copy for reference, but nothing else. I'd be tempted to "de-stub" [[MT 39/246]] for the same reason. --[[User:Ritchie333\|Ritchie333]] 10:12, 18 February 2010 (UTC)		::I don't see why not - I think I've gone through the whole file now and extracted most of the interesting bits of it. I think there's one or two odds and sods I wanted to camera copy for reference, but nothing else. I'd be tempted to "de-stub" [[MT 39/246]] for the same reason. --[[User:Ritchie333\|Ritchie333]] 10:12, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
			:::"De-stub"? "Contra-stub"? "Disstubulate"? I think we need a meeting to discuss proper terminology ;) --[[User:Chris5156\|chris5156]] 11:28, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Ritchie333: /* MT 39/241 */

2010-02-18T10:12:28Z

MT 39/241

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:12, 18 February 2010
Line 30:		Line 30:

	I think we can remove the 'stub' template from this page now, unless you have some pretty epic plans for it? :) --[[User:Chris5156\|chris5156]] 22:05, 17 February 2010 (UTC)		I think we can remove the 'stub' template from this page now, unless you have some pretty epic plans for it? :) --[[User:Chris5156\|chris5156]] 22:05, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
			::I don't see why not - I think I've gone through the whole file now and extracted most of the interesting bits of it. I think there's one or two odds and sods I wanted to camera copy for reference, but nothing else. I'd be tempted to "de-stub" [[MT 39/246]] for the same reason. --[[User:Ritchie333\|Ritchie333]] 10:12, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

Chris5156: /* MT 39/241 */ new section

2010-02-17T22:05:21Z

MT 39/241: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:05, 17 February 2010
Line 26:		Line 26:

	:::I think [[:Category:Waste of Time]] might be our fastest-growing page! --[[User:Chris5156\|chris5156]] 17:28, 11 February 2010 (UTC)		:::I think [[:Category:Waste of Time]] might be our fastest-growing page! --[[User:Chris5156\|chris5156]] 17:28, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

			== [[MT 39/241]] ==

			I think we can remove the 'stub' template from this page now, unless you have some pretty epic plans for it? :) --[[User:Chris5156\|chris5156]] 22:05, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Chris5156: /* South Orbital Road */

2010-02-11T17:28:14Z

South Orbital Road

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:28, 11 February 2010
Line 24:		Line 24:

	::Wise words there. Last week when I was in with Chris, I stayed right up until closing time just to grab [[MT 39/311]] to quickly do rough camera copies of maps or planned routes. In retrospect, I needn't have bothered. --[[User:Ritchie333\|Ritchie333]] 09:22, 11 February 2010 (UTC)		::Wise words there. Last week when I was in with Chris, I stayed right up until closing time just to grab [[MT 39/311]] to quickly do rough camera copies of maps or planned routes. In retrospect, I needn't have bothered. --[[User:Ritchie333\|Ritchie333]] 09:22, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

			:::I think [[:Category:Waste of Time]] might be our fastest-growing page! --[[User:Chris5156\|chris5156]] 17:28, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Ritchie333: /* South Orbital Road */

2010-02-11T09:22:18Z

South Orbital Road

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:22, 11 February 2010
Line 22:		Line 22:

	:Of course, A405 wasn't reserved for the NOR in 1922 - A405 was in West London then. Still, this sounds like it'll either be a really interesting file, or one sheet of tat. [[User:Steven\|Steven]] 23:19, 10 February 2010 (UTC)		:Of course, A405 wasn't reserved for the NOR in 1922 - A405 was in West London then. Still, this sounds like it'll either be a really interesting file, or one sheet of tat. [[User:Steven\|Steven]] 23:19, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

			::Wise words there. Last week when I was in with Chris, I stayed right up until closing time just to grab [[MT 39/311]] to quickly do rough camera copies of maps or planned routes. In retrospect, I needn't have bothered. --[[User:Ritchie333\|Ritchie333]] 09:22, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Steven: /* South Orbital Road */

2010-02-10T23:19:22Z

South Orbital Road

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:19, 10 February 2010
Line 20:		Line 20:

	My guess is that this file will deal with plans to begin work on the matching South Orbital at around the same time. It isn't planning for one of the Ringways, but it might show how they settled upon a route that would later be recycled for the M25 and might explain why the North Orbital got started and the South Orbital didn't. --[[User:Chris5156\|chris5156]] 13:40, 10 February 2010 (UTC)		My guess is that this file will deal with plans to begin work on the matching South Orbital at around the same time. It isn't planning for one of the Ringways, but it might show how they settled upon a route that would later be recycled for the M25 and might explain why the North Orbital got started and the South Orbital didn't. --[[User:Chris5156\|chris5156]] 13:40, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

			:Of course, A405 wasn't reserved for the NOR in 1922 - A405 was in West London then. Still, this sounds like it'll either be a really interesting file, or one sheet of tat. [[User:Steven\|Steven]] 23:19, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:28, 18 February 2010
Line 31:		Line 31:
	I think we can remove the 'stub' template from this page now, unless you have some pretty epic plans for it? :) --[[User:Chris5156\|chris5156]] 22:05, 17 February 2010 (UTC)		I think we can remove the 'stub' template from this page now, unless you have some pretty epic plans for it? :) --[[User:Chris5156\|chris5156]] 22:05, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
	::I don't see why not - I think I've gone through the whole file now and extracted most of the interesting bits of it. I think there's one or two odds and sods I wanted to camera copy for reference, but nothing else. I'd be tempted to "de-stub" [[MT 39/246]] for the same reason. --[[User:Ritchie333\|Ritchie333]] 10:12, 18 February 2010 (UTC)		::I don't see why not - I think I've gone through the whole file now and extracted most of the interesting bits of it. I think there's one or two odds and sods I wanted to camera copy for reference, but nothing else. I'd be tempted to "de-stub" [[MT 39/246]] for the same reason. --[[User:Ritchie333\|Ritchie333]] 10:12, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
			:::"De-stub"? "Contra-stub"? "Disstubulate"? I think we need a meeting to discuss proper terminology ;) --[[User:Chris5156\|chris5156]] 11:28, 18 February 2010 (UTC)