Difference between revisions of "User talk:Chris5156"

From ArchiveWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: ==Ringways & maps== Have you come up with a way of using maps for Ringways References? Do you want scans uploading here, or whatever information can be given? ~~~~)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
==Ringways & maps==
==Ringways & maps==
Have you come up with a way of using maps for Ringways References?  Do you want scans uploading here, or whatever information can be given? [[User:Steven|Steven]] 20:44, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Have you come up with a way of using maps for Ringways References?  Do you want scans uploading here, or whatever information can be given? [[User:Steven|Steven]] 20:44, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
:No, I haven't come up with anything, and if I said I'd been actively thinking about it I'd be lying :) I have no objection to uploading map scans if you want to go that way - I think really I was just imagining the creation of a page for each map we need to reference that would list the useful information it contains, and the publisher, year and so on, rather like we list files at archives.
:There's no reason at all not to put extracts online if it helps us reference our sources though! We could always try one or two and see how it looks. --[[User:Chris5156|chris5156]] 21:33, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:33, 21 February 2010

Ringways & maps

Have you come up with a way of using maps for Ringways References? Do you want scans uploading here, or whatever information can be given? Steven 20:44, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

No, I haven't come up with anything, and if I said I'd been actively thinking about it I'd be lying :) I have no objection to uploading map scans if you want to go that way - I think really I was just imagining the creation of a page for each map we need to reference that would list the useful information it contains, and the publisher, year and so on, rather like we list files at archives.
There's no reason at all not to put extracts online if it helps us reference our sources though! We could always try one or two and see how it looks. --chris5156 21:33, 21 February 2010 (UTC)