PREM 13/2997: Difference between revisions
From ArchiveWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
It is a simple reminder to ministers that, as the whole Ringway plan would have to go to public inquiry, they should not comment on it. A minister expressing an opinion would lead to them being questioned by the inquiry panel on their views, which could prove highly "embarassing" for the minister who would eventually have to sign off the inquiry's findings. | It is a simple reminder to ministers that, as the whole Ringway plan would have to go to public inquiry, they should not comment on it. A minister expressing an opinion would lead to them being questioned by the inquiry panel on their views, which could prove highly "embarassing" for the minister who would eventually have to sign off the inquiry's findings. | ||
=People with camera copies== | ==People with camera copies== | ||
[[User:Chris5156|Chris Marshall]] has a copy of the final memo draft only. | [[User:Chris5156|Chris Marshall]] has a copy of the final memo draft only. | ||
Latest revision as of 22:26, 13 June 2014
London primary road network: motorway box; advice to ministers on attitude they should adopt
| Date range | 1969 |
| Location | National Archives (see all files stored here) |
| Catalogue | See entry |
| File base | Series PREM, subseries PREM 13 |
Context
A very short file, containing only the memo mentioned in the title and perhaps one or two draft versions and photocopies of it.
It is a simple reminder to ministers that, as the whole Ringway plan would have to go to public inquiry, they should not comment on it. A minister expressing an opinion would lead to them being questioned by the inquiry panel on their views, which could prove highly "embarassing" for the minister who would eventually have to sign off the inquiry's findings.
People with camera copies
Chris Marshall has a copy of the final memo draft only.
